Penetration Testing
usmewe undergoes regular penetration testing to identify vulnerabilities in our web, mobile, and API infrastructure.Testing Overview
Penetration testing is performed quarterly and before major releases.
| Component | Last Test | Next Scheduled | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Web App | - | Q2 2025 | Planned |
| Mobile App | - | Q2 2025 | Planned |
| API | - | Q2 2025 | Planned |
| Infrastructure | - | Q2 2025 | Planned |
Testing Methodology
OWASP Testing Guide
We follow the OWASP Testing Guide v4.2 methodology:Information Gathering
Reconnaissance and fingerprinting
Configuration Testing
Server and platform configuration
Identity Management
Registration, authentication, authorization
Session Management
Session tokens, timeouts, fixation
Input Validation
SQL injection, XSS, command injection
Business Logic
Workflow bypass, abuse cases
Testing Types
Black Box Testing
Simulates external attacker with no internal knowledge:- Reconnaissance
- Vulnerability scanning
- Exploitation attempts
- Post-exploitation
Gray Box Testing
Tester has limited information (typical user access):- Authenticated testing
- Role-based access control
- API endpoint testing
- Business logic testing
White Box Testing
Full access to source code and architecture:- Code review
- Architecture analysis
- Configuration review
- Cryptographic implementation
Test Areas
Web Application
Mobile Application (iOS & Android)
| Test Category | Description |
|---|---|
| Data Storage | Keychain/Keystore, local files, logs |
| Network | Certificate pinning, TLS configuration |
| Authentication | Biometrics, session handling |
| Code Quality | Reverse engineering, tampering |
| Platform | Permission model, IPC security |
API Security
| Test | Description |
|---|---|
| Authentication | JWT validation, token expiry |
| Authorization | Endpoint access control, IDOR |
| Rate Limiting | Brute force protection |
| Input Validation | Parameter tampering, injection |
| Data Exposure | Sensitive data in responses |
Infrastructure
- Cloud configuration (AWS/GCP)
- Network segmentation
- Secret management
- Logging and monitoring
- Incident response
OWASP Top 10 Coverage
| Vulnerability | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| A01: Broken Access Control | Tested | Role-based access, IDOR checks |
| A02: Cryptographic Failures | Tested | TLS, encryption at rest |
| A03: Injection | Tested | SQL, NoSQL, command injection |
| A04: Insecure Design | Tested | Threat modeling review |
| A05: Security Misconfiguration | Tested | Headers, configs |
| A06: Vulnerable Components | Tested | Dependency scanning |
| A07: Auth Failures | Tested | Session, MFA |
| A08: Data Integrity Failures | Tested | Serialization, CI/CD |
| A09: Logging Failures | Tested | Audit logs |
| A10: SSRF | Tested | Server-side requests |
Findings Summary
No penetration tests completed yet. Results will be published after testing.
Finding Template
When testing is complete, findings will be documented as:| ID | Severity | Category | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| PT-001 | - | - | - |
Remediation Process
Testing Partners
We work with qualified security firms:Selection Criteria
Selection Criteria
- CREST/OSCP/OSCE certified testers
- Experience with DeFi/blockchain applications
- Clean track record
- Comprehensive reporting
Engagement Process
Engagement Process
- Scope definition and rules of engagement
- Testing window coordination
- Daily status updates during testing
- Draft report review
- Final report and remediation planning
Continuous Testing
Beyond periodic penetration tests:| Tool | Purpose | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| SAST | Static code analysis | Every commit |
| DAST | Dynamic scanning | Weekly |
| Dependency Scan | Vulnerable packages | Daily |
| Secret Scan | Leaked credentials | Every commit |
Request Access
Security researchers can request access to:- Testnet environment
- API documentation
- Source code (under NDA)